ISG Software Research Analyst Perspectives

Platform Thinking: The HR Tech Strategy You’re Probably Missing

Written by Matthew Brown | Jan 14, 2026 11:00:00 AM

HR technology is entering a new era, and with it comes a challenge that many leaders underestimate: the need to embrace platform thinking as a core competency. For years, we’ve approached technology decisions as a way to solve pain points—patching gaps, fixing inefficiencies and responding to immediate needs. That mindset is understandable, but it’s also the reason so many organizations are constrained by the very systems that were once celebrated. Today’s decisions harden into tomorrow’s limitations, and unless HR develops the ability to think in terms of platforms and architecture, we will keep repeating the same mistakes.

Platform thinking is not about chasing the latest buzzword or adding complexity for its own sake. It’s about designing for the future with intention. It means looking beyond the next implementation and asking how data, workflows and experiences will connect across an ecosystem that is constantly evolving. It puts technology at the center of the conversation—not as a reactive fix, but as the foundation for adaptability. When HR leaders adopt this mindset, they stop asking, “Which tool solves my problem?” and start asking, “Which design creates opportunity?”

This shift matters because the employee experience is no longer defined by isolated transactions. Workers expect seamless, personalized interactions that feel intuitive and anticipate their needs. That expectation is colliding with the rise of AI, which is transforming how systems learn, predict and respond. AI is not just a feature tucked inside an application; it is becoming a platform capability that spans the entire ecosystem. It governs how models are hosted, how prompts are managed and how sensitive data is protected. Without platform thinking, organizations risk bolting AI onto brittle architectures, creating more complexity instead of more intelligence.

The urgency is clear. By 2027, HCM software providers will realize the limitations of application suites and will focus on GenAI, Agentic AI and worker twins to engage HR and managers for requests and notifications. That pivot signals a fundamental truth: The future of HR technology will not be defined by static modules but by dynamic platforms that orchestrate experiences and decisions. For HR leaders, this means procurement conversations must evolve. It’s no longer enough to ask what a system does today; we must ask how it will enable AI-driven personalization, conversational interfaces and predictive insights tomorrow.

Employee experience is where this becomes tangible. Imagine a worker navigating benefits, pay and career development. In a platform-centric world, those interactions feel unified because identity, workflow and data services operate as shared capabilities. AI amplifies this by curating recommendations, surfacing learning paths and guiding career moves in real time. Without a platform foundation, those experiences fragment. Employees bounce between portals, data gets duplicated and personalization becomes a patchwork of disconnected features. The result is frustration—and ultimately disengagement.

Data stewardship is another critical piece of the puzzle. A single master employee record that spans domains is essential, but it only works when teams collaborate on schemas and versioning. Too many organizations align beautifully during implementation, then drift apart. HR changes a field without warning, the change causes a finance report to break, IT scrambles to patch and suddenly everyone is playing whack-a-mole. Governance and communication aren’t optional. My colleague has written about Data as a Business Discipline for AI. It creates an operating model that keeps AI-driven insights accurate and employee experiences consistent.

Integration follows the same logic. Event-driven designs create real-time awareness when critical changes occur, and they matter more than ever in an AI-enabled world. When a hire or transfer triggers workflows across HR, IT, Finance and Operations, those events feed models that personalize onboarding, predict attrition risk and optimize scheduling. If those signals are delayed or lost in brittle integrations, AI becomes blind—and the experience suffers.

Executives may not rally around the phrase “platform thinking,” but they care deeply about outcomes. Two measures tell the story: time to insight and time to change. When those improve, the business feels it. AI thrives on timely, clean data, and platforms make that possible. They shorten the distance between a question and an answer, between a strategy and its execution. They turn HR technology from a constraint into a catalyst.

I’ve seen what happens when this approach works. A global company locked into a suite discovered it couldn’t support skills-based staffing for a new business line. Instead of ripping everything out, they declared identity, integration, workflow and skills data as platform services. They introduced an event bus for hire and transfer, added a talent intelligence tool as an extensible component and exposed low-code orchestration for HR operations. The result was faster staffing cycles, cleaner data contracts and the freedom to swap components without surgery. AI capabilities layered on top of this foundation didn’t just automate tasks—they elevated the experience, guiding managers and employees toward better decisions without friction.

This is the conversation HR leaders need to start. Don’t wait for a crisis to adopt platform thinking. Ask whether your current strategy reflects it—or if there’s work to do. Look for the places where rigidity has crept in and where assumptions about software provider “best practices” have gone unchallenged. Then begin the pivot. Raise HR’s platform literacy. Engage IT as a true partner. Design for intentional connections. If we do this, HR technology stops playing catch-up and starts shaping the future of work—one where AI and employee experience aren’t competing priorities but complementary outcomes of a well-designed platform.

Regards,

Matthew Brown