Play audio
Executive Summary
Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management
The global population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, from 8 billion in 2023, fueling efforts to meet growing energy needs. The demand for all types of energy sources—including traditional fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, along with nuclear and renewable sources like solar, wind and hydropower—has introduced a spectrum of innovative energy-delivery technology that must be continuously operated and governed. Now intertwined with governments, the public and the private sector, these systems require physical and digital protection to ensure the continuity of power and utilities everywhere on the planet.
The power and utilities industry is in a state of flux, with demand for electricity on the rise.
Global trends are changing how regions and countries transform energy infrastructure. Impacts include the steadily increasing demand for renewable energy and sustainability, government regulations, the development of smart cities, geopolitical situations and fossil fuel prices. The decarbonization and clean energy transition is driven by significant legislative support and investments to reduce emissions while maintaining market prices that support consumer and business economics.
This requires the power and utilities industry to keep pace with functional needs, such as:
- Focusing on grid transformation. For reliability and flexibility, especially in the face of increasing weather and climate-related challenges, advanced delivery mechanisms such as virtual power plants and microgrids are essential for supporting cleaner and more reliable energy sources.
- Managing supply chain resilience. Accessibility of critical components such as steel, aluminum and transformers is key to minimizing disruptions, developing domestic supply chains and reducing dependency on foreign materials.
- Incorporating clean and renewable energy sources. These energies are growing in utilization, creating new demand for technologies to support them and the intertwining of operations with traditional sources.
- Keeping pace with technology. Artificial intelligence and smart infrastructure with meters and grids play a significant role in the integration of centralized and alternative energy sources to ensure flexibility in meeting supply and demand.
The power and utilities industry is in a state of flux, with demand for electricity on the rise. Driven by economic growth and electrification trends, the path forward is peppered with challenges and opportunities. The clean energy transition is a major driver of renewables, particularly solar and wind, and is projected to surpass coal as the leading source of global electricity generation.
The grid, however, is struggling to keep pace with the changing energy landscape. Aging infrastructure, coupled with the integration of distributed energy resources like rooftop solar, presents reliability concerns. Transformation efforts are underway but require significant capital investment, which is further complicated by rising interest rates and cycles of inflation that impact the cost of fuel and resulting prices. Regulatory frameworks pressure the balance between ensuring grid resilience and keeping energy affordable.
The power and utilities industry relies heavily on a vast network of infrastructure and equipment, including power plants, substations, transmission lines and distribution grids. The technology to support power and utilities is always in operation, but in some ways also inevitably in crisis. Ensuring consumer consumption across traditional power grids and equipment requires continuous support.
Effective asset management in the utility industry is crucial for systematically planning, utilizing and maintaining physical assets such as turbines, transmission lines and transformers throughout the service life to ensure durability. Implementing strong asset management practices leads to improved productivity, lower maintenance costs, enhanced equipment reliability and increased safety, helping enterprises maximize resource efficiency. Energy facilities that adopt comprehensive asset-management strategies for maintaining efficient, functional and environmentally friendly assets boost production efficiency substantively.
However, managing assets in the utility sector is complex and challenging due to the capital-intensive nature of the industry and factors like remote maintenance, underutilization, extended asset life cycles, limited
expertise and environmental risks. Supporting the grid and expanded operations of the power and utilities industry requires enterprise asset management software, which delivers optimized asset performance, enhanced reliability, reduced costs and improved operational efficiency. Through 2027, over one-half of the power and utilities industry will update enterprise asset management systems to meet the need for continuity in operations across the energy supply chain.
EAM requirements have evolved to include innovations in operations and insights to support management and operators efficiently. ISG defines enterprise asset management in the power and utilities industry to support asset life cycle management, maintenance, repair and operations, labor management, controls management, application maintenance and support, supply chain applications, cloud services, asset health management, digital enablement services and remote monitoring. The software enables enterprises to increase asset performance, extend its useful life and reduce operational costs.
Enterprises assessing EAM software face many considerations, including how it supports the aging infrastructure and maintenance priorities required to ensure reliable performance, as well as the intricately complex and proprietary interconnected systems that make it difficult to isolate and address problems without adverse impacts. The environmental factors of climate change and extreme weather events affect the performance and lifespan of utility assets, increasing the need for resilient infrastructure. The wide variety of remote locations and challenging environments makes maintenance and inspections difficult and costly. Underutilization of assets and fluctuations in demand coupled with operational inefficiencies potentially increase costs and reduce return on investment. And the dwindling knowledge and expertise available increases the risk of not maintaining and repairing assets efficiently.
The convergence of EAM with emerging technologies is driving innovation and value creation.
EAM software plays a vital role in maintaining the smooth and efficient operation of utilities for enhanced safety and compliance, maximized uptime and efficiency, optimized costs, an empowered workforce and improved decision-making. EAM software facilitates the comprehensive management and maintenance of assets from capital planning and procurement through installation, performance monitoring, maintenance, compliance, risk management and asset disposal.
The convergence of EAM with emerging technologies is driving innovation and value creation. Incorporating AI offers more intelligent and predictive maintenance and operations, furthering integration with IoT and cloud computing environments. Augmented reality and digital twin technology create virtual replicas of physical assets, enabling enterprises to simulate operations, predict disruptions and optimize maintenance for reduced downtime and extended asset lifespan. Mobile technology continues to evolve and support the entire life cycle of communications, scheduling and real-time updates from field service. And through the use of data, the consumption and relevant relationships to sustainability and carbon footprints are more easily managed.
Today’s EAM systems can enhance efficiency, streamline maintenance processes, reduce manual tasks and improve resource allocation. This enables substantial efficiencies and cost savings by optimizing asset utilization, minimizing downtime and reducing maintenance expenses. A further benefit is uninterrupted service delivery due to improved reliability through proactive maintenance and predictive analytics that identify potential failures before they occur. These systems also enable enhanced sustainability by tracking asset carbon footprints, optimizing energy consumption and identifying opportunities for renewable energy integration.
This ISG Buyers Guide evaluates software providers offering asset management systems for the power and utilities sector. Key features include asset health monitoring, predictive maintenance, work and labor management and supply chain optimization. Advanced functionalities like computerized maintenance management, geographic information, supervisory control, data acquisition and AI-driven analytics are essential. Integration with next-gen technologies such as automation, IoT, AI, cloud and blockchain is critical for enhancing operational efficiency and asset performance.
The ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management evaluates products based on a capability framework that supports asset collaboration and management, device coordination, field service and preventative and predictive management. These core EAM capabilities are the foundation for today’s power and utilities industry.
This research evaluates the following software providers that offer products to address key elements of power and utilities EAM as we define it: AspenTech, AssetWorks, CGI, GE Vernova, Hexagon, Hitachi Energy, IBM, IFS, Landis+Gyr, Oracle, Ramco and SAP.
Buyers Guide Overview
For over two decades, ISG Research has conducted market research in a spectrum of areas across business applications, tools and technologies. We have designed the Buyers Guide to provide a balanced perspective of software providers and products that is rooted in an understanding of the business requirements in any enterprise. Utilization of our research methodology and decades of experience enables our Buyers Guide to be an effective method to assess and select software providers and products. The findings of this research undertaking contribute to our comprehensive approach to rating software providers in a manner that is based on the assessments completed by an enterprise.
ISG Research has designed the Buyers Guide to provide a balanced perspective of software providers and products that is rooted in an understanding of business requirements in any enterprise.
The ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management is the distillation of over a year of market and product research efforts. It is an assessment of how well software providers’ offerings address enterprises’ requirements for EAM software specific to power and utilities. The index is structured to support a request for information (RFI) that could be used in the request for proposal (RFP) process by incorporating all criteria needed to evaluate, select, utilize and maintain relationships with software providers. An effective product and customer experience with a provider can ensure the best long-term relationship and value achieved from a resource and financial investment.
In this Buyers Guide, ISG Research evaluates the software in seven key categories that are weighted to reflect buyers’ needs based on our expertise and research. Five are product-experience related: Adaptability, Capability, Manageability, Reliability, and Usability. In addition, we consider two customer-experience categories: Validation, and Total Cost of Ownership/Return on Investment (TCO/ROI). To assess functionality, one of the components of Capability, we applied the ISG Research Value Index methodology and blueprint, which links the personas and processes for EAM to an enterprise’s requirements.
The structure of the research reflects our understanding that the effective evaluation of software providers and products involves far more than just examining product features, potential revenue or customers generated from a provider’s marketing and sales efforts. We believe it is important to take a comprehensive, research-based approach, since making the wrong choice of EAM technology can raise the total cost of ownership, lower the return on investment and hamper an enterprise’s ability to reach its full performance potential. In addition, this approach can reduce the project’s development and deployment time and eliminate the risk of relying on a short list of software providers that does not represent a best fit for your enterprise.
ISG Research believes that an objective review of software providers and products is a critical business strategy for the adoption and implementation of EAM software and applications. An enterprise’s review should include a thorough analysis of both what is possible and what is relevant. We urge enterprises to do a thorough job of evaluating EAM systems and tools related to power and utilities and offer this Buyers Guide as both the results of our in-depth analysis of these providers and as an evaluation methodology.
How To Use This Buyers Guide
Evaluating Software Providers: The Process
We recommend using the Buyers Guide to assess and evaluate new or existing software providers for your enterprise. The market research can be used as an evaluation framework to establish a formal request for information from providers on products and customer experience and will shorten the cycle time when creating an RFI. The steps listed below provide a process that can facilitate best possible outcomes.
- Define the business case and goals.
Define the mission and business case for investment and the expected outcomes from your organizational and technology efforts. - Specify the business needs.
Defining the business requirements helps identify what specific capabilities are required with respect to people, processes, information and technology. - Assess the required roles and responsibilities.
Identify the individuals required for success at every level of the organization from executives to front line workers and determine the needs of each. - Outline the project’s critical path. What needs to be done, in what order and who will do it? This outline should make clear the prior dependencies at each step of the project plan.
- Ascertain the technology approach. Determine the business and technology approach that most closely aligns to your organization’s requirements.
- Establish technology vendor evaluation criteria. Utilize the product experience: Adaptability, Capability, Manageability, Reliability and Usability, and the customer experience in TCO/ROI and Validation.
- Evaluate and select the technology properly. Weight the categories in the technology evaluation criteria to reflect your organization’s priorities to determine the short list of vendors and products.
- Establish the business initiative team to start the project.
Identify who will lead the project and the members of the team needed to plan and execute it with timelines, priorities and resources.
The Findings
All of the products we evaluated are feature-rich, but not all the capabilities offered by a software provider are equally valuable to types of workers or support everything needed to manage products on a continuous basis. Moreover, the existence of too many capabilities may be a negative factor for an enterprise if it introduces unnecessary complexity. Nonetheless, you may decide that a larger number of features in the product is a plus, especially if some of them match your enterprise’s established practices or support an initiative that is driving the purchase of new software.
Factors beyond features and functions or software provider assessments may become a deciding factor. For example, an enterprise may face budget constraints such that the TCO evaluation can tip the balance to one provider or another. This is where the Value Index methodology and the appropriate category weighting can be applied to determine the best fit of software providers and products to your specific needs.
Overall Scoring of Software Providers Across Categories
The research finds SAP atop the list, followed by IBM and Hitachi Energy. Providers that place in the top three of a category earn the designation of Leader. SAP and IBM have done so in five categories; Oracle and Hitachi Energy in three; GE Vernova in two; and AspenTech, IFS, Hexagon and CGI in one category.
The overall representation of the research below places the rating of the Product Experience and Customer Experience on the x and y axes, respectively, to provide a visual representation and classification of the software providers. Those providers whose Product Experience have a higher weighted performance to the axis in aggregate of the five product categories place farther to the right, while the performance and weighting for the two Customer Experience categories determines placement on the vertical axis. In short, software providers that place closer to the upper-right on this chart performed better than those closer to the lower-left.
The research places software providers into one of four overall categories: Assurance, Exemplary, Merit or Innovative. This representation classifies providers’ overall weighted performance.
Exemplary: The categorization and placement of software providers in Exemplary (upper right) represent those that performed the best in meeting the overall Product and Customer Experience requirements. The providers rated Exemplary are: SAP, IBM, Hitachi Energy, IFS and AspenTech.
Innovative: The categorization and placement of software providers in Innovative (lower right) represent those that performed the best in meeting the overall Product Experience requirements but did not achieve the highest levels of requirements in Customer Experience. The provider rated Innovative is: Oracle.
Assurance: The categorization and placement of software providers in Assurance (upper left) represent those that achieved the highest levels in the overall Customer Experience requirements but did not achieve the highest levels of Product Experience. The provider rated Assurance is: GE Vernova.
Merit: The categorization of software providers in Merit (lower left) represents those that did not exceed the median of performance in Customer or Product Experience or surpass the threshold for the other three categories. The providers rated Merit are: Hexagon, Landis+Gyr, CGI, Ramco and AssetWorks.
We warn that close provider placement proximity should not be taken to imply that the packages evaluated are functionally identical or equally well suited for use by every enterprise or for a specific process. Although there is a high degree of commonality in how enterprises handle power and utilities enterprise asset management, there are many idiosyncrasies and differences in how they do these functions that can make one software provider’s offering a better fit than another’s for a particular enterprise’s needs.
We advise enterprises to assess and evaluate software providers based on organizational requirements and use this research as a supplement to internal evaluation of a provider and products.
Product Experience
The process of researching products to address an enterprise’s needs should be comprehensive. Our Value Index methodology examines Product Experience and how it aligns with an enterprise’s life cycle of onboarding, configuration, operations, usage and maintenance. Too often, software providers are not evaluated for the entirety of the product; instead, they are evaluated on market execution and vision of the future, which are flawed since they do not represent an enterprise’s requirements but how the provider operates. As more software providers orient to a complete product experience, evaluations will be more robust.
The research results in Product Experience are ranked at 80%, or four-fifths, of the overall rating using the specific underlying weighted category performance. Importance was placed on the categories as follows: Usability (10%), Capability (30%), Reliability (15%), Adaptability (10%) and Manageability (15%). This weighting impacted the resulting overall ratings in this research. SAP, Oracle and IBM were designated Product Experience Leaders. While not Leaders, Hitachi Energy and IFS were also found to meet a broad range of enterprise product experience requirements.
Customer Experience
The importance of a customer relationship with a software provider is essential to the actual success of the products and technology. The advancement of the Customer Experience and the entire life cycle an enterprise has with its software provider is critical for ensuring satisfaction in working with that provider. Technology providers that have chief customer officers are more likely to have greater investments in the customer relationship and focus more on their success. These leaders also need to take responsibility for ensuring this commitment is made abundantly clear on the website and in the buying process and customer journey.
The research results in Customer Experience are ranked at 20%, or one-fifth, using the specific underlying weighted category performance as it relates to the framework of commitment and value to the software provider-customer relationship. The two evaluation categories are Validation (10%) and TCO/ROI (10%), which are weighted to represent their importance to the overall research.
The software providers that evaluated the highest overall in the aggregated and weighted Customer Experience categories are GE Vernova, IBM and SAP. These category Leaders best communicate commitment and dedication to customer needs. While not a Leader, Hitachi Energy was also found to meet a broad range of enterprise customer experience requirements.
Software providers that did not perform well in this category were unable to provide sufficient customer case studies to demonstrate success or articulate their commitment to customer experience and an enterprise’s journey. The selection of a software provider means a continuous investment by the enterprise, so a holistic evaluation must include examination of how they support their customer experience.
Appendix: Software Provider Inclusion
For inclusion in the ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management in 2024, a software provider must be in good standing financially and ethically, have at least $15 million in annual or projected revenue verified using independent sources, sell products and provide support on at least two continents, and have at least 20 customers. The principal source of the relevant business unit’s revenue must be software-related, and there must have been at least one major software release in the past 12 months.
Software providers with basic or premium enterprise asset management suite functionality are evaluated on the ability to offer a combination (if not all) of the following asset management capabilities:
- Analytics and reporting
- Asset health management
- Computerized maintenance management system
- Controls management
- Digital EAM systems (based on AI and ML)
- Failure prediction
- Geographic information system
- MRO management
- Predictive maintenance
- SCADA
- Supply chain transformation
- Warranty management
- Work and labor management
The research is designed to be independent of the specifics of software provider packaging and pricing. To represent the real-world environment in which businesses operate, we include providers that offer suites or packages of products that may include relevant individual modules or applications. If a software provider is actively marketing, selling and developing a product for the general market and it is reflected on the provider’s website that the product is within the scope of the research, that provider is automatically evaluated for inclusion.
All software providers that offer relevant EAM products and meet the inclusion requirements were invited to participate in the evaluation process at no cost to them.
Software providers that meet our inclusion criteria but did not completely participate in our Buyers Guide were assessed solely on publicly available information. As this could have a significant impact on classification and ratings, we recommend additional scrutiny when evaluating those providers.
Products Evaluated
|
Provider |
Product Names |
Version |
Release |
|
AspenTech |
aspenONE |
14.5 |
November 2024 |
|
AssetWorks |
AssetWorks EAM |
.24.2 |
August 2024 |
|
CGI |
CGI OpenGrid DERMS |
2024 |
2024 |
|
GE Vernova |
GE APM |
On-Premises APM 5.2.0.0.0 |
September 2024 |
|
Hexagon |
HxGN EAM |
12.2 |
November 2024 |
|
Hitachi Energy |
Lumada |
8.1 |
October 2024 |
|
IBM |
Maximo Application Suite (MAS) |
9.0.5 |
November 2024 |
|
IFS |
IFS Cloud 24R2 |
2024 |
October 2024 |
|
Landis+Gyr |
AMI Field Operations Manager |
2.0.0.18 |
October 2023 |
|
Oracle |
Oracle Utilities Work and Asset Cloud Service |
24b |
July 2024 |
|
Ramco |
Ramco ERP on Cloud 2024 |
EAM 5.0 |
October 2023 |
|
SAP |
SAP S/4HANA Cloud |
2408 |
July 2024 |
Providers of Promise
We did not include software providers that, as a result of our research and analysis, did not satisfy the criteria for inclusion in this Buyers Guide. These are listed below as “Providers of Promise.”
|
Provider |
Product |
Revenue |
Customers |
Capabilities |
|
Mainpac |
Mainpac EAM |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Uplight |
Uplight |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Executive Summary
Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management
The global population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050, from 8 billion in 2023, fueling efforts to meet growing energy needs. The demand for all types of energy sources—including traditional fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, along with nuclear and renewable sources like solar, wind and hydropower—has introduced a spectrum of innovative energy-delivery technology that must be continuously operated and governed. Now intertwined with governments, the public and the private sector, these systems require physical and digital protection to ensure the continuity of power and utilities everywhere on the planet.
The power and utilities industry is in a state of flux, with demand for electricity on the rise.
Global trends are changing how regions and countries transform energy infrastructure. Impacts include the steadily increasing demand for renewable energy and sustainability, government regulations, the development of smart cities, geopolitical situations and fossil fuel prices. The decarbonization and clean energy transition is driven by significant legislative support and investments to reduce emissions while maintaining market prices that support consumer and business economics.
This requires the power and utilities industry to keep pace with functional needs, such as:
- Focusing on grid transformation. For reliability and flexibility, especially in the face of increasing weather and climate-related challenges, advanced delivery mechanisms such as virtual power plants and microgrids are essential for supporting cleaner and more reliable energy sources.
- Managing supply chain resilience. Accessibility of critical components such as steel, aluminum and transformers is key to minimizing disruptions, developing domestic supply chains and reducing dependency on foreign materials.
- Incorporating clean and renewable energy sources. These energies are growing in utilization, creating new demand for technologies to support them and the intertwining of operations with traditional sources.
- Keeping pace with technology. Artificial intelligence and smart infrastructure with meters and grids play a significant role in the integration of centralized and alternative energy sources to ensure flexibility in meeting supply and demand.
The power and utilities industry is in a state of flux, with demand for electricity on the rise. Driven by economic growth and electrification trends, the path forward is peppered with challenges and opportunities. The clean energy transition is a major driver of renewables, particularly solar and wind, and is projected to surpass coal as the leading source of global electricity generation.
The grid, however, is struggling to keep pace with the changing energy landscape. Aging infrastructure, coupled with the integration of distributed energy resources like rooftop solar, presents reliability concerns. Transformation efforts are underway but require significant capital investment, which is further complicated by rising interest rates and cycles of inflation that impact the cost of fuel and resulting prices. Regulatory frameworks pressure the balance between ensuring grid resilience and keeping energy affordable.
The power and utilities industry relies heavily on a vast network of infrastructure and equipment, including power plants, substations, transmission lines and distribution grids. The technology to support power and utilities is always in operation, but in some ways also inevitably in crisis. Ensuring consumer consumption across traditional power grids and equipment requires continuous support.
Effective asset management in the utility industry is crucial for systematically planning, utilizing and maintaining physical assets such as turbines, transmission lines and transformers throughout the service life to ensure durability. Implementing strong asset management practices leads to improved productivity, lower maintenance costs, enhanced equipment reliability and increased safety, helping enterprises maximize resource efficiency. Energy facilities that adopt comprehensive asset-management strategies for maintaining efficient, functional and environmentally friendly assets boost production efficiency substantively.
However, managing assets in the utility sector is complex and challenging due to the capital-intensive nature of the industry and factors like remote maintenance, underutilization, extended asset life cycles, limited expertise and environmental risks. Supporting the grid and expanded operations of the power and utilities industry requires enterprise asset management software, which delivers optimized asset performance, enhanced reliability, reduced costs and improved operational efficiency. Through 2027, over one-half of the power and utilities industry will update enterprise asset management systems to meet the need for continuity in operations across the energy supply chain.
EAM requirements have evolved to include innovations in operations and insights to support management and operators efficiently. ISG defines enterprise asset management in the power and utilities industry to support asset life cycle management, maintenance, repair and operations, labor management, controls management, application maintenance and support, supply chain applications, cloud services, asset health management, digital enablement services and remote monitoring. The software enables enterprises to increase asset performance, extend its useful life and reduce operational costs.
Enterprises assessing EAM software face many considerations, including how it supports the aging infrastructure and maintenance priorities required to ensure reliable performance, as well as the intricately complex and proprietary interconnected systems that make it difficult to isolate and address problems without adverse impacts. The environmental factors of climate change and extreme weather events affect the performance and lifespan of utility assets, increasing the need for resilient infrastructure. The wide variety of remote locations and challenging environments makes maintenance and inspections difficult and costly. Underutilization of assets and fluctuations in demand coupled with operational inefficiencies potentially increase costs and reduce return on investment. And the dwindling knowledge and expertise available increases the risk of not maintaining and repairing assets efficiently.
The convergence of EAM with emerging technologies is driving innovation and value creation.
EAM software plays a vital role in maintaining the smooth and efficient operation of utilities for enhanced safety and compliance, maximized uptime and efficiency, optimized costs, an empowered workforce and improved decision-making. EAM software facilitates the comprehensive management and maintenance of assets from capital planning and procurement through installation, performance monitoring, maintenance, compliance, risk management and asset disposal.
The convergence of EAM with emerging technologies is driving innovation and value creation. Incorporating AI offers more intelligent and predictive maintenance and operations, furthering integration with IoT and cloud computing environments. Augmented reality and digital twin technology create virtual replicas of physical assets, enabling enterprises to simulate operations, predict disruptions and optimize maintenance for reduced downtime and extended asset lifespan. Mobile technology continues to evolve and support the entire life cycle of communications, scheduling and real-time updates from field service. And through the use of data, the consumption and relevant relationships to sustainability and carbon footprints are more easily managed.
Today’s EAM systems can enhance efficiency, streamline maintenance processes, reduce manual tasks and improve resource allocation. This enables substantial efficiencies and cost savings by optimizing asset utilization, minimizing downtime and reducing maintenance expenses. A further benefit is uninterrupted service delivery due to improved reliability through proactive maintenance and predictive analytics that identify potential failures before they occur. These systems also enable enhanced sustainability by tracking asset carbon footprints, optimizing energy consumption and identifying opportunities for renewable energy integration.
This ISG Buyers Guide evaluates software providers offering asset management systems for the power and utilities sector. Key features include asset health monitoring, predictive maintenance, work and labor management and supply chain optimization. Advanced functionalities like computerized maintenance management, geographic information, supervisory control, data acquisition and AI-driven analytics are essential. Integration with next-gen technologies such as automation, IoT, AI, cloud and blockchain is critical for enhancing operational efficiency and asset performance.
The ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management evaluates products based on a capability framework that supports asset collaboration and management, device coordination, field service and preventative and predictive management. These core EAM capabilities are the foundation for today’s power and utilities industry.
This research evaluates the following software providers that offer products to address key elements of power and utilities EAM as we define it: AspenTech, AssetWorks, CGI, GE Vernova, Hexagon, Hitachi Energy, IBM, IFS, Landis+Gyr, Oracle, Ramco and SAP.
Buyers Guide Overview
For over two decades, ISG Research has conducted market research in a spectrum of areas across business applications, tools and technologies. We have designed the Buyers Guide to provide a balanced perspective of software providers and products that is rooted in an understanding of the business requirements in any enterprise. Utilization of our research methodology and decades of experience enables our Buyers Guide to be an effective method to assess and select software providers and products. The findings of this research undertaking contribute to our comprehensive approach to rating software providers in a manner that is based on the assessments completed by an enterprise.
ISG Research has designed the Buyers Guide to provide a balanced perspective of software providers and products that is rooted in an understanding of business requirements in any enterprise.
The ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management is the distillation of over a year of market and product research efforts. It is an assessment of how well software providers’ offerings address enterprises’ requirements for EAM software specific to power and utilities. The index is structured to support a request for information (RFI) that could be used in the request for proposal (RFP) process by incorporating all criteria needed to evaluate, select, utilize and maintain relationships with software providers. An effective product and customer experience with a provider can ensure the best long-term relationship and value achieved from a resource and financial investment.
In this Buyers Guide, ISG Research evaluates the software in seven key categories that are weighted to reflect buyers’ needs based on our expertise and research. Five are product-experience related: Adaptability, Capability, Manageability, Reliability, and Usability. In addition, we consider two customer-experience categories: Validation, and Total Cost of Ownership/Return on Investment (TCO/ROI). To assess functionality, one of the components of Capability, we applied the ISG Research Value Index methodology and blueprint, which links the personas and processes for EAM to an enterprise’s requirements.
The structure of the research reflects our understanding that the effective evaluation of software providers and products involves far more than just examining product features, potential revenue or customers generated from a provider’s marketing and sales efforts. We believe it is important to take a comprehensive, research-based approach, since making the wrong choice of EAM technology can raise the total cost of ownership, lower the return on investment and hamper an enterprise’s ability to reach its full performance potential. In addition, this approach can reduce the project’s development and deployment time and eliminate the risk of relying on a short list of software providers that does not represent a best fit for your enterprise.
ISG Research believes that an objective review of software providers and products is a critical business strategy for the adoption and implementation of EAM software and applications. An enterprise’s review should include a thorough analysis of both what is possible and what is relevant. We urge enterprises to do a thorough job of evaluating EAM systems and tools related to power and utilities and offer this Buyers Guide as both the results of our in-depth analysis of these providers and as an evaluation methodology.
How To Use This Buyers Guide
Evaluating Software Providers: The Process
We recommend using the Buyers Guide to assess and evaluate new or existing software providers for your enterprise. The market research can be used as an evaluation framework to establish a formal request for information from providers on products and customer experience and will shorten the cycle time when creating an RFI. The steps listed below provide a process that can facilitate best possible outcomes.
- Define the business case and goals.
Define the mission and business case for investment and the expected outcomes from your organizational and technology efforts. - Specify the business needs.
Defining the business requirements helps identify what specific capabilities are required with respect to people, processes, information and technology. - Assess the required roles and responsibilities.
Identify the individuals required for success at every level of the organization from executives to front line workers and determine the needs of each. - Outline the project’s critical path. What needs to be done, in what order and who will do it? This outline should make clear the prior dependencies at each step of the project plan.
- Ascertain the technology approach. Determine the business and technology approach that most closely aligns to your organization’s requirements.
- Establish technology vendor evaluation criteria. Utilize the product experience: Adaptability, Capability, Manageability, Reliability and Usability, and the customer experience in TCO/ROI and Validation.
- Evaluate and select the technology properly. Weight the categories in the technology evaluation criteria to reflect your organization’s priorities to determine the short list of vendors and products.
- Establish the business initiative team to start the project.
Identify who will lead the project and the members of the team needed to plan and execute it with timelines, priorities and resources.
The Findings
All of the products we evaluated are feature-rich, but not all the capabilities offered by a software provider are equally valuable to types of workers or support everything needed to manage products on a continuous basis. Moreover, the existence of too many capabilities may be a negative factor for an enterprise if it introduces unnecessary complexity. Nonetheless, you may decide that a larger number of features in the product is a plus, especially if some of them match your enterprise’s established practices or support an initiative that is driving the purchase of new software.
Factors beyond features and functions or software provider assessments may become a deciding factor. For example, an enterprise may face budget constraints such that the TCO evaluation can tip the balance to one provider or another. This is where the Value Index methodology and the appropriate category weighting can be applied to determine the best fit of software providers and products to your specific needs.
Overall Scoring of Software Providers Across Categories
The research finds SAP atop the list, followed by IBM and Hitachi Energy. Providers that place in the top three of a category earn the designation of Leader. SAP and IBM have done so in five categories; Oracle and Hitachi Energy in three; GE Vernova in two; and AspenTech, IFS, Hexagon and CGI in one category.
The overall representation of the research below places the rating of the Product Experience and Customer Experience on the x and y axes, respectively, to provide a visual representation and classification of the software providers. Those providers whose Product Experience have a higher weighted performance to the axis in aggregate of the five product categories place farther to the right, while the performance and weighting for the two Customer Experience categories determines placement on the vertical axis. In short, software providers that place closer to the upper-right on this chart performed better than those closer to the lower-left.
The research places software providers into one of four overall categories: Assurance, Exemplary, Merit or Innovative. This representation classifies providers’ overall weighted performance.
Exemplary: The categorization and placement of software providers in Exemplary (upper right) represent those that performed the best in meeting the overall Product and Customer Experience requirements. The providers rated Exemplary are: SAP, IBM, Hitachi Energy, IFS and AspenTech.
Innovative: The categorization and placement of software providers in Innovative (lower right) represent those that performed the best in meeting the overall Product Experience requirements but did not achieve the highest levels of requirements in Customer Experience. The provider rated Innovative is: Oracle.
Assurance: The categorization and placement of software providers in Assurance (upper left) represent those that achieved the highest levels in the overall Customer Experience requirements but did not achieve the highest levels of Product Experience. The provider rated Assurance is: GE Vernova.
Merit: The categorization of software providers in Merit (lower left) represents those that did not exceed the median of performance in Customer or Product Experience or surpass the threshold for the other three categories. The providers rated Merit are: Hexagon, Landis+Gyr, CGI, Ramco and AssetWorks.
We warn that close provider placement proximity should not be taken to imply that the packages evaluated are functionally identical or equally well suited for use by every enterprise or for a specific process. Although there is a high degree of commonality in how enterprises handle power and utilities enterprise asset management, there are many idiosyncrasies and differences in how they do these functions that can make one software provider’s offering a better fit than another’s for a particular enterprise’s needs.
We advise enterprises to assess and evaluate software providers based on organizational requirements and use this research as a supplement to internal evaluation of a provider and products.
Product Experience
The process of researching products to address an enterprise’s needs should be comprehensive. Our Value Index methodology examines Product Experience and how it aligns with an enterprise’s life cycle of onboarding, configuration, operations, usage and maintenance. Too often, software providers are not evaluated for the entirety of the product; instead, they are evaluated on market execution and vision of the future, which are flawed since they do not represent an enterprise’s requirements but how the provider operates. As more software providers orient to a complete product experience, evaluations will be more robust.
The research results in Product Experience are ranked at 80%, or four-fifths, of the overall rating using the specific underlying weighted category performance. Importance was placed on the categories as follows: Usability (10%), Capability (30%), Reliability (15%), Adaptability (10%) and Manageability (15%). This weighting impacted the resulting overall ratings in this research. SAP, Oracle and IBM were designated Product Experience Leaders. While not Leaders, Hitachi Energy and IFS were also found to meet a broad range of enterprise product experience requirements.
Customer Experience
The importance of a customer relationship with a software provider is essential to the actual success of the products and technology. The advancement of the Customer Experience and the entire life cycle an enterprise has with its software provider is critical for ensuring satisfaction in working with that provider. Technology providers that have chief customer officers are more likely to have greater investments in the customer relationship and focus more on their success. These leaders also need to take responsibility for ensuring this commitment is made abundantly clear on the website and in the buying process and customer journey.
The research results in Customer Experience are ranked at 20%, or one-fifth, using the specific underlying weighted category performance as it relates to the framework of commitment and value to the software provider-customer relationship. The two evaluation categories are Validation (10%) and TCO/ROI (10%), which are weighted to represent their importance to the overall research.
The software providers that evaluated the highest overall in the aggregated and weighted Customer Experience categories are GE Vernova, IBM and SAP. These category Leaders best communicate commitment and dedication to customer needs. While not a Leader, Hitachi Energy was also found to meet a broad range of enterprise customer experience requirements.
Software providers that did not perform well in this category were unable to provide sufficient customer case studies to demonstrate success or articulate their commitment to customer experience and an enterprise’s journey. The selection of a software provider means a continuous investment by the enterprise, so a holistic evaluation must include examination of how they support their customer experience.
Appendix: Software Provider Inclusion
For inclusion in the ISG Buyers Guide™ for Power and Utilities Enterprise Asset Management in 2024, a software provider must be in good standing financially and ethically, have at least $15 million in annual or projected revenue verified using independent sources, sell products and provide support on at least two continents, and have at least 20 customers. The principal source of the relevant business unit’s revenue must be software-related, and there must have been at least one major software release in the past 12 months.
Software providers with basic or premium enterprise asset management suite functionality are evaluated on the ability to offer a combination (if not all) of the following asset management capabilities:
- Analytics and reporting
- Asset health management
- Computerized maintenance management system
- Controls management
- Digital EAM systems (based on AI and ML)
- Failure prediction
- Geographic information system
- MRO management
- Predictive maintenance
- SCADA
- Supply chain transformation
- Warranty management
- Work and labor management
The research is designed to be independent of the specifics of software provider packaging and pricing. To represent the real-world environment in which businesses operate, we include providers that offer suites or packages of products that may include relevant individual modules or applications. If a software provider is actively marketing, selling and developing a product for the general market and it is reflected on the provider’s website that the product is within the scope of the research, that provider is automatically evaluated for inclusion.
All software providers that offer relevant EAM products and meet the inclusion requirements were invited to participate in the evaluation process at no cost to them.
Software providers that meet our inclusion criteria but did not completely participate in our Buyers Guide were assessed solely on publicly available information. As this could have a significant impact on classification and ratings, we recommend additional scrutiny when evaluating those providers.
Products Evaluated
|
Provider |
Product Names |
Version |
Release |
|
AspenTech |
aspenONE |
14.5 |
November 2024 |
|
AssetWorks |
AssetWorks EAM |
.24.2 |
August 2024 |
|
CGI |
CGI OpenGrid DERMS |
2024 |
2024 |
|
GE Vernova |
GE APM |
On-Premises APM 5.2.0.0.0 |
September 2024 |
|
Hexagon |
HxGN EAM |
12.2 |
November 2024 |
|
Hitachi Energy |
Lumada |
8.1 |
October 2024 |
|
IBM |
Maximo Application Suite (MAS) |
9.0.5 |
November 2024 |
|
IFS |
IFS Cloud 24R2 |
2024 |
October 2024 |
|
Landis+Gyr |
AMI Field Operations Manager |
2.0.0.18 |
October 2023 |
|
Oracle |
Oracle Utilities Work and Asset Cloud Service |
24b |
July 2024 |
|
Ramco |
Ramco ERP on Cloud 2024 |
EAM 5.0 |
October 2023 |
|
SAP |
SAP S/4HANA Cloud |
2408 |
July 2024 |
Providers of Promise
We did not include software providers that, as a result of our research and analysis, did not satisfy the criteria for inclusion in this Buyers Guide. These are listed below as “Providers of Promise.”
|
Provider |
Product |
Revenue |
Customers |
Capabilities |
|
Mainpac |
Mainpac EAM |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Uplight |
Uplight |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Fill out the form to continue reading.